Ex Parte Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. State · Christiansen v. State · Lackey v. State · Hodge v. State · Nevarez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An information is sufficient if it has the following requisites: "(1) * * * "(2) That it appears to have been presented in a court having jurisdiction of the offense set for the; "(3) * * * "(5) It must appear that the place where the offense is charged to have bene committed is within the jurisdiction of the court where the information is filed; "(6) That the ti me mentioned be some date anterior to the filing of the information, and that the offense does not appear to be barred by limitation; "(7) That the offense be set forth in plain and intelligible words; "(8) * * * "(9) * * *"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex parte Hyett · Ex Parte Hyett““In the name and by the authority of the State of Texas, the Grand Jurors, good and lawful men of the County of Dallas and State of Texas, ... do present . . . that one MICHAEL DEAN LANE, ... in the County and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully then and there, knowingly and intentionally damage and destroy tangible property, namely: one boat, one house and furnishings, without the effective consent of Edward E. Hamilton, the owner; the said damage and destruction amounting to a pecuniary loss of over $10,000.00....””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Ex Parte Hyett“A person represented by legal counsel may in open court or by written instrument voluntarily waive the right to be accused by indictment of any offense other than a capital felony. On waiver as provided in this article, the accused shall be charged by information.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Vester v. State · Ex Parte Hyett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.