Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 F.2d 1228 - Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10

Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10’s Empirical Analysis

605 F.2d 1228 · 1979

Citation profile

152
cited by 152 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 152 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably Saudi Arabia v. Nelson (1993), New York v. Shore Realty Corp. (1985)

61 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions

81019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Pierson v. Ray · Carey v. Piphus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[When a DAT is issued,] the accused bears the inconvenience and expense of appearing in court and, perhaps more important, is subject to the anxiety induced by a pending criminal charge. Moreover, if others learn that charges have been lodged against the accused, his character is no less traduced because the accusation is contained in an Appearance Ticket rather than in a summons.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “disciplinary charges cannot be heard upon remand (from the district court) for a new trial by those who previously heard the charges.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “derive from a common nucleus of operative fact”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.