Faberge Incorporated v. Saxony Products Inc Faberge Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
605 F.2d 426 · 1979
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Lindy Pen Company Inc v. Bic Pen Corporation (1993), Alpha Industries, Inc. v. Alpha Steel Tube & Shapes, Inc. (1980)
16 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · The J. B. Williams Company, Inc. v. Le Conte Cosmetics, Inc., and Elton C. Toland and Lenore Toland · Maier Brewing Company, a Corporation v. Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Maier Brewing Company, a Corporation v. James Buchanan & Co., Ltd. · Hmh Publishing Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Playboy Clubs International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Victor Brincat
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]illful infringement may support an award of profits to the plaintiff, but does not require one”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.