Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

605 F.2d 492

Docket Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654 and 77-3655.

Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court for Western District of Washington Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union Inc

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • PUGET SOUND GILLNETTERS ASSOCIATION et alv.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, United States of America et al., Real Parties in Interest
  • COLUMBIA RIVER FISHERMEN'S PROTECTIVE UNION, INC., et al., Petitioners-v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF OREGON, Respondent, and United States of America et al., Real Parties in Interest-
  • UNITED STATES of America et alv.STATE OF WASHINGTON et al

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1979.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1985

Relies on Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn. · Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Real Parties in Interest. Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union, Inc., Petitioners v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and United States of America, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. United States of America v. State of Washington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-09-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

These cases come before us for consideration in light of the judgment and order of the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 3055, 61 L.Ed.2d 823 (1979), vacating the judgment of this court, 573 F.2d 1123, in these causes and remanding them for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2

It is therefore ordered that the judgment previously entered by this court in causes Nos. 77-3129, 77-3208, 77-3209, 77-3654, and 77-3655, is affirmed to the extent that it is consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court, and the causes are remanded to the United States District Courts for the Western District of Washington and the District of Oregon for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

/605/f2d/492 · .json · Public domain