Harvey v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis
605 F.3d 1091 · 2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Dunn v. Blumstein · Nordlinger v. Hahn · Oregon v. Mitchell · Cheff v. Schnackenberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“little trouble concluding that Arizona ha[d] a rational basis for restoring voting rights only to those felons who have completed the terms of their sentences, which includes the payment of any fines or restitution orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Thompson v. State“complain about their loss of a fundamental right to vote because felon disenfranchisement is explicitly permitted under the terms of Richardson , [4]18 U.S. at 55, 94 S.Ct. 2655 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Thompson v. State“At bottom, plaintiffs provide absolutely no support for the proposition that the word 'crimes' meant 'common-law felonies' at the time of the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.