Coventry First, LLC v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'Here, Coventry had not previously amended its complaint and the Commissioner had not filed a .responsive pleading. Pursuant to Rule 15(a), Coventry could have amehded its complaint as a matter of course.”); Williams v. Board of Regents of Univ. Sys. of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2007) (“The. district court erred in failing to allow Williams to file her first amended complaint as a matter of course.”); But see Scótt Blanton v. Universal City Studios Prods., LLP, 244 F.R.D. 67, 70 (D.D.C.2007) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 179 So. 3d 1127 - Mary Meeks v. Hologic, Inc.

2. “As the District Court concluded, section 626.9922(1) of the Act specifically gives the Commissioner the right to examine the business records of licensees, and there is no indication that the scope of this right was limited to in-state transactions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Coventry First, LLC v. State, Office of Insurance Regulation

3. “A proposed amendment may be denied for futility 'when the complaint as amended would still be properly dismissed.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 309 F. Supp. 3d 1207 - Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. STME, LLC