Pendleton v. Acuff-Rose Publications, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Mazer v. Stein · Ingraham v. Wright · Angrist v. United States · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon any work, ... a great number of patterns of increasing generality will fit equally well, ... but there is a point in this series of abstractions where they are no longer protected, since otherwise the playwright could prevent the use of his ‘ideas,’ to which, apart from their expression, his [copyright] is never extended.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether an average lay observer would recognize the alleged copy as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.