605 F. Supp. 2d 296 - Miller v. McCormick’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 13661 · 42 U.S.C. § 13662 · 42 U.S.C. § 13663 · 42 U.S.C. § 1437F · 42 U.S.C. § 16913
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. May · Bryson v. Shumway · United States v. Godin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The PHA must establish standards that prohibit admission to the program if any member of the household is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a State sex offender registration program. In this screening of applicants, the PHA must perform criminal history background checks necessary to determine whether any household member is subject to a lifetime sex offender registration requirement in the State where the housing is located and in other States where the household members are known to have resided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.