Baum v. ASTRAZENECA LP’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 29 U.S.C. § 202 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Caminetti v. United States · Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Brooklyn Sav Bank v. O'Neil Dize
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The touchstone for making a sale, under the Federal Regulations, is obtaining a commitment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the statutory language does not require a final sale, complete and consummated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.