Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 P.2d 771 - Frampton v. Wilson

Frampton v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Giusti v. Sterling Wentworth Corp. (2009), Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp. (1993)

35 state decisions

12019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Everett Holder · Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co. · Sloan v. Owen · Kling Appeal · 169 Ind. App. 39 - Calhoun v. Hammond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... those fees which are required to be paid to the court and to witnesses, and for which the statutes authorize to be included in the judgment. There is a distinction to be understood between the legitimate and taxable “costs” and other “expenses” of litigation which may be ever so necessary, but are not properly taxable as costs. Consistent with that distinction, the courts hold that expert witnesses cannot be awarded extra compensation unless the statute expressly so provides.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'trial court is persuaded that [the depositions] were taken in good faith and, in the light of the cireumstances, appeared to be essential for the development and presentation of the case'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.