Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 So. 2d 1237 - Ex Parte Gingo

605 So. 2d 1237 - Ex Parte Gingo’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2020 · most notably Illinois v. Fisher (2004), State v. Morales (1995)

24 state decisions

1201992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Killian v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The presence or absence of bad faith by the police for purposes of the Due Process Clause must necessarily turn on the police's knowledge of the exculpatory value of the evidence at the time it was lost or destroyed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[U]nless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Although to show bad faith, for the purpose of showing a due process violation, the defendant must show that the State had knowledge of the exculpatory value of the destroyed evidence, 'there may well be cases in which the defendant is unable to prove that the State acted in bad faith but in which the loss or destruction of evidence is nonetheless so critical to the defense as to make a criminal trial fundamentally unfair.' Youngblood , 488 U.S. at 67 , 109 S.Ct. at 342 (Stevens, J., concurring in the result). We think that this is such a case."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.