Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

605 So. 2d 167

Roberts Roofing Co. v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-09-15

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2003

4 state decisions

Relies on 418 So. 2d 437 - Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc. · 549 So. 2d 706 - Antun Investments Corp. v. Ergas · Ren-Del Enterprises, Inc. v. FLA. KEYS FIRST STATE BANK

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-09-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial judge’s findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic’s lien.

¶2Affirmed.

/605/so2d/167 · .json · Public domain