605 So. 2d 17 - Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 722 So. 2d 512 - DeLoach v. State (1998), 708 So. 2d 1327 - Duplantis v. State (1998)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Pollard v. United States · Moore v. Arizona · Strunk v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]his Court will uphold the trial court's findings . . . where supported by `substantial, credible evidence; [but] if no probative evidence supports the trial court's finding[s] . . ., this Court will ordinarily reverse.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. State · Clayton v. State“whether the trial delay rose from good cause.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.