Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

605 So. 2d 170

Cridland v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-09-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1993

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-09-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of a final order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. In that petition, appellant alleged that he had been improperly denied an appropriate amount of incentive gain time for the month of June 1989. Pursuant to an order to show cause issued by the trial court, appellee, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, filed a response to the petition. However, no evidentiary hearing was held. Instead, the trial court concluded from the petition and response thereto that appellant was not entitled to the relief requested.

¶2In our opinion, the petition and response thereto do not conclusively establish that appellant is not entitled to the relief requested in the petition. Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse the order of the trial court denying the petition for a writ of mandamus; and to remand with directions that the trial court hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the allegations of appellant’s petition.

¶3REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.MINER, J., dissents without written opinion.
/605/so2d/170 · .json · Public domain