Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

605 So. 2d 178

Greer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-10-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1993

1 state decisions

Relies on Griner v. State · Willis v. State · Kemp v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-10-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Because the trial judge orally promised appellant jail time credit and because appellant is entitled to such credit as a matter of law,1 we reverse that portion of the defendant’s sentence which fails to give him credit for time served in the county jail before sentencing. On remand the trial court shall determine the exact credit for jail time before sentencing and amend the written sentence to provide such credit against the 270 days appellant is required to serve in the county jail as a specific condition of community control.

¶2SENTENCED VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB, COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

¶3. See Willis v. State, 543 So.2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). See also Griner v. State, 523 So.2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), Kemp v. State, 526 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Meyers v. State, 524 So.2d 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (all holding that defendant is entitled to credit for time served in jail awaiting his trial and disposition as against jail term imposed as condition of probation).

/605/so2d/178 · .json · Public domain