Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

605 So. 2d 459

605 So.2d 459

17 Fla.L.WeeklySupp. 600

Adderly v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 24, 1992

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1992-09-24

Relies on 603 So. 2d 504 - Scates v. State · State v. Adderly · State v. Adderly

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-09-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018

2 district · 5 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We review State v. Adderly, 596 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court subsequently certified the following question as being of great public importance:

MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?

¶2State v. Adderly, 602 So.2d 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (on motion for rehearing).

¶3Upon the authority of Scales v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Adderly’s probation.

¶4It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
/605/so2d/459 · .json · Public domain