Barrett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 589 So. 2d 933 - Lowder v. State · 511 So. 2d 583 - Huhn v. State · 227 So. 2d 543 - Zabner v. Howard Johnson's Incorporated of Florida · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[R]elevancy is founded on materiality, the nexus between a fact being proved and a disputed issue, and probativeness, the effect this evidence would have on the existence of that fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unlawful about having cash in one's pocket.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.