Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 SO2D 697 - State v. Leonard

State v. Leonard’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2012

5 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bram v. United States · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 440 So. 2d 129 - State v. Benoit · 403 So. 2d 1157 - State v. Petterway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A confession obtained by direct or implied promises, however slight, or by the exertion of any improper influence must be considered involuntary and inadmissible. State v. Morvant, 384 So.2d 765 (La.1980); [ State v. ] Leonard, supra [ 605 So.2d 697 (La.App. 2 Cir.1992)]. However, a mild exhortation to tell the truth, or a remark that if the defendant cooperates the officer will `do what he can' or `things will go easier,' does not negate the voluntary nature of the confession. [ State v. ] English, supra [ 582 So.2d 1358 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1991)]. Further, informing a defendant that the district attorney will be advised of any cooperation is insufficient to overcome the free and voluntary nature of a confession. State v. Vernon, 385 So.2d 200 (La.1980); State v. Jackson, 523 So.2d 251 (La.App.2d Cir.1988), writ denied, 530 So.2d 565 (La.1988).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.