Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 SO2D 805 - Barner v. Gorman

Barner v. Gorman’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably 656 So. 2d 790 - Palmer v. Anderson Infirmary Benevolent Ass'n (1995), 954 So. 2d 951 - Hubbard v. Wansley (2007)

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

340199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 564 So. 2d 1346 - Palmer v. Biloxi Regional Medical Center, Inc. · 457 So. 2d 941 - Dennis v. Searle · 516 So. 2d 488 - Phillips by and Through Phillips v. Hull · 508 So. 2d 1072 - Burnham v. Tabb · 458 So. 2d 714 - Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not only must this expert identify and articulate the requisite standard that was not complied with, the expert must also establish that the failure was the proximate cause, or proximate contributing cause, of the alleged injuries.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the existence of a duty on the part of the physician to conform to the specific standard of conduct, the applicable standard of care, the failure to perform to that standard, that the breach of duty by the physician was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injury, and that damages to plaintiff have resulted.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Summary judgment is not a substitute for trial regarding disputed issues of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.