Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 SW2D 835 - State v. Horner

State v. Horner’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Armour v. Totty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the objects seized were in plain view; (2) the viewer had a right to be in position for the view; (3) the seized object was discovered inadvertently; and (4) the incriminating nature of the object was immediately apparent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.