Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 605 SW2D 861 - Kramer v. State

Kramer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Zwickler v. Koota · Cohen v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally: (1) communicates by telephone or in writing in vulgar, profane, obscene, or indecent language or in a coarse and offensive manner and by this action intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly annoys or alarms the recipient or intends to annoy or alarm the recipient;”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Under this provision of the harassment statute the elements the State must prove are (1) a person (2) intentionally (3) communicates (by telephone or writing) (4)(a) in vulgar, profane, obscene, or indecent language or (b) in a coarse and offensive manner and by such action (5)(a) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly annoys or alarms the recipient or (b) intends to annoy or alarm the recipient.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “recognize the interest of the State in protecting the recipient's privacy within the house;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.