Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 A.2d 64 - Baldwin v. Benge

Baldwin v. Benge’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co. · Peters v. Gelb · Loftus v. Hayden · Suarez ex rel. Suarez v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc. · Butler v. Alatur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Any physician who has been in the active practice of medicine or surgery for at least the past 5 years and who currently practices in the State or within a state contiguous to the State and within a radius of 75 miles of the Capitol of the State shall be presumed to be competent to give expert medical testimony as to applicable standards of skill and care, if it shall be established that the degree of skill and care required of the expert in the locality where the expert practices or teaches is of the same or equivalent standard as the skill and care employed in the community or locality where the alleged malpractice occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) No person shall be competent to give expert medical testimony as to applicable standards of skill and care unless such person is familiar with that degree of skill ordinarily employed in the community or locality where the alleged malpractice occurred, under similar circumstances, by members of the profession practiced by the health care provider; provided, however, that any such expert witness need not be licensed in the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.