Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 A.2d 793 - State v. Hill

State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
7
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2026

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

901992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Brown v. Texas · United States v. Walker · State v. Boilard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Ojnce a defendant has been validly seized, the scope of subsequent police conduct must be ... evaluated to determine whether it is reasonable under all the circumstances.... In this case, Hill was validly stopped for a suspected traffic violation. Officer Low then sought to ensure that Hill was neither unlicensed nor operating an unregistered vehicle. Balancing this significant state interest against the minimal further intrusion of asking Hill for the documents, we hold that Officer Low did not unreasonably intrude on Hill’s Fourth Amendment rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Vehicle stops for traffic violations occur countless times each day; and on these occasions, licenses and registration papers are subject to inspection and drivers without them will be ascertained.... [I]t must be assumed that finding an unlicensed driver among those who commit traffic violations is a much more likely event than finding an unlicensed driver by choosing randomly from the entire universe of drivers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.