Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 F.2d 332 - Grimaldi v. United States

Grimaldi v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

606 F.2d 332 · 1979

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
8
states following
September 2002
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably 45 Cal. 3d 1268 - People v. Williams (1988), United States v. Abrams (1980)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions

2901979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 471 (Counterfeit Deterrence Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 474

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “paraphernalia used in the manufacture of counterfeit federal reserve notes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(t)he proper function of the opening statement of the prosecutor is limited to a discussion of the evidence which he intends to introduce and believes in good faith is admissible and available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unnecessary risk of injecting the danger of irremediable prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.