Gatimi v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
606 F.3d 344 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean · McMahon v. United States · Role Models America, Inc. v. Brownlee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Genital mutilation of one’s wife, unless one happens to be a supporter of the practice, is a way to punish one, and so the menace to Mrs. Gatimi is a legitimate component of Mr. Gatimi’s case. To send her back to Kenya to face female genital mutilation would be to enable persecution of him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kone v. Holder“does not address the question whether allocation is permissible under the [EAJA], thus allowing an award of fees for the part of the government's case that was not substantially justified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.