Wallace v. McGlothan’s Empirical Analysis
606 F.3d 410 · 2010
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Dunnigan · Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. · Collins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a jury verdict for the moving party moots the issue”). It would waste time and resources to require a party to move for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b), formerly denominated “judgment notkwithstanding the verdict,” if that party has obtained a jury verdict in its favor. 4 . The dissent argues that judgment as a matter of law is unwarranted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Thus, if a party raises a new argument in its Rule 50(b) motion that was not presented in the Rule 50(a) motion, the non-moving party can properly object.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it can be granted only on grounds advanced in the preverdict motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.