Swanson v. DeSantis’s Empirical Analysis
606 F.3d 829 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Rose v. Lundy · Jones v. Bock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he justification for immediate appeal must ... be sufficiently strong to overcome the usual benefits of deferring appeal until litigation concludes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Claim-by-claim litigation in the district and appellate courts 'undermines [Congress'] goal of streamlining federal habeas proceedings....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kell v. Benzon“be 'effectively unreviewable' if not addressed through an interlocutory appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.