Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

606 So. 2d 1289

Matos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-11-13

Decided 1992-11-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the state failed to prove at trial that she embezzled in excess of $20,000 of her employer’s funds. As to the sentence, however, the state acknowledges the combined sentence of community control and probation exceeds the statutory maximum. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for correction.

¶2JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/606/so2d/1289 · .json · Public domain