Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

606 So. 2d 1289

Oropesa v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-11-13

Relies on 489 So. 2d 25 - Scurry v. State · 509 So. 2d 1332 - Rey v. State · 498 So. 2d 1005 - Perez v. State

Decided 1992-11-13

PER CURIAM.

¶1Finding a valid departure reason supported by the record, Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986), Rey v. State, 509 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written sentence to comport with the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing that the terms be served concurrently. Perez v. State, 498 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.
/606/so2d/1289 · .json · Public domain