Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 So. 2d 187 - Ashley v. State

606 So. 2d 187 - Ashley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona · Ex Parte Branch · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appellant failed to establish a prima facie case under Batson and Ex parte Branch . . . because the appellant failed to show any evidence of discrimination other than the number of blacks struck”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] decision on a motion for a new trial rests largely within the discretion of the trial court, and [that] in reviewing such a decision this court will indulge every presumption in favor of the correctness thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in order to find out whether a knife existed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.