Broers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Brown v. State · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · 480 So. 2d 1291 - Gage v. State · 440 So. 2d 628 - Yesnes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this context, “knowledge” means that there was a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the acts engaged in would cause or tend to cause or encourage delinquency. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law-abiding person would observe in the actor’s situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kito v. State“Hence, the only inculpatory evidence disclosed by this record, evidence we find woefully inadequate to satisfy the state’s burden, is that [the defendant] occupied the drug-infested premises with others. The mere presence of marijuana, concealed from plain view, does not establish knowledge, especially when the harboring premises are jointly occupied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.