Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 SW2D 5 - Ex parte Gonzales

Ex parte Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2018

3 state decisions

101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Davis · Ex Parte Herring · Ex Parte Hart · Ex Parte Sauser · Ex Parte Garza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We hold that an order finding a person in contempt but suspending punishment on condition of compliance with the court’s order, provides no authority in itself for arrest and confinement. A subsequent hearing to determine breach of the condition and a subsequent unconditional commitment is necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.