Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 S.W.2d 677 - Gee v. Read

Gee v. Read’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2016

21 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tigner v. First Nat. Bank of Angleton · Huffman v. Huffman · Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Fredericks · Powers v. First Natl. Bank of Corsicana · Calvery v. Calvery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “primary object of inquiry in interpreting [the] will is [to determine] the intent of the testator[s].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.