Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 606 SW2D 777 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · North Carolina v. Butler · Missouri v. Sours · State v. Degraffenreid · Sours v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Given the drastic nature of the remedy of a mistrial, Degraffenried does not require a mistrial on every case where such testimony slips into a trial. A proper exercise of discretion is still allowed insofar as declaring a mistrial is concerned and the trial court here did not abuse its discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.