Ex parte Warnell’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1990
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Barbee v. State · Aydelott v. State · Ex parte Conner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The style of all writs and process shall be, ‘The State of Texas.’ All prosecutions shall be carried on in the name and by authority of the State of Texas, and shall conclude: ‘Against the peace and dignity of the State,’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saenz v. State““An indictment shall be deemed sufficient if it has the following requisites: (1) - (8) The indictment concludes, ‘Against the peace and dignity of the State.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saenz v. State““An information is sufficient if it has the following requisites: (1) - (8) That it conclude ‘Against the peace and dignity of the State.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saenz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.