Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 F.2d 1063 - Golofski v. Califano

Golofski v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis

607 F.2d 1063 · 1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
January 1995
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1995

6 federal appellate ·

40197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Richardson v. Perales · Detenber v. American Universal Insurance Co · Gober v. Matthews · Henry v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an individual who recovered from a prior disability is not entitled to disability benefits unless he is still insured under the Social Security Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “he is not free to set his own expertise against that of a physician who testified before him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.