Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 F.2d 148 - Monroe v. Blackburn

Monroe v. Blackburn’s Empirical Analysis

607 F.2d 148 · 1979

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
4
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably State v. Iacona (2001), State v. Jackson (1991)

13 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

3101979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Glasser v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Parham v. J. L. · Galtieri v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The prosecution's suppression of evidence; (2) The favorable character of the suppressed evidence for the defense; (3) The materiality of the suppressed evidence.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sexton v. State · 539 So. 2d 400 - Cephus v. State
  2. “Appellant argues that Brady , supra, requires the State to disclose the fact of the victim's contracting gonorrhea and the fact that appellant's test results were negative. In order to establish a Brady violation the appellant must prove:”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 518 So. 2d 781 - Funches v. State · 505 So. 2d 1242 - Geeslin v. State
  3. “The heart of the holding in Brady is the prosecution's suppression of evidence, in the face of a defense production request, where the evidence is favorable to the accused and is material either to guilt or to punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 505 So. 2d 1242 - Geeslin v. State · Ogle v. Estelle

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.