Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 F.2d 265 - United States v. Bodey

United States v. Bodey’s Empirical Analysis

607 F.2d 265 · 1979

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1993 · most notably Grubbs v. Hannigan (1993), Bullard v. Estelle (1982)

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

230197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Burks v. United States · Linkletter v. Walker · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is significantly different from procedural guarantees held in the Linkletter line of cases to have prospective effect only. While this guarantee, like the others, is a constitutional right of the criminal defendant, its practical result is to prevent a trial from taking place at all, rather than to proscribe procedural rules that govern the conduct of a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) introduc[ing] its own expert testimony in rebuttal; or (2) discredit[ing] the defendant's expert testimony on cross-examination; or (3) rely[ing] upon evidence from which the jury may infer that the defendant's expert testimony depends on an incorrect view of the facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “government must present sufficient evidence the first time to get a second chance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.