Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 F.2d 286 - United States v. Hooker

United States v. Hooker’s Empirical Analysis

607 F.2d 286 · 1979

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2013
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2013

15 federal appellate ·

12019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barber v. Page · Smith v. Hooey · Ponzi v. Fessenden · First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional Cuba · United States v. Schmidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree with Judge Kaufman, writing for the Second Circuit in United States v. Salzmann, 2 Cir., 1976, 548 F.2d 395 , where he says: Where the American right to demand extradition is established by treaty, considerations of foreign policy might well be subordinated to speedy trial. Where the United States must rely solely on comity, however, diplomatic factors may properly be taken into account in determining what diligence is due....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e do not think that it would be proper for us to adopt a rule ... that would, in substance, require the Attorney General or his agents to embark on [negotiations for the release to this country of a defendant not subject to extradition by treaty], or require [the Attorney General] to try to persuade the Department of State to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.