United States v. Salsedo’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.2d 318 · 1979
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2003 · most notably United States v. Duncan (1982), United States v. Jackson (1985)
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. Calandra · United States v. Nobles · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an appointment of an interpreter lies within the sound discretion of a trial judge ... such appointment will be disturbed on appeal ... if the judge has abused that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.