United States v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.2d 687 · 1979
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2003
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 960
Relies on United States v. Munsey Trust Co. · Smith v. United States · United States v. Parr · United States v. Bursey · United States v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no case has been cited by the Government to justify the direct application of that money to the fine, by court order, without pursuing whatever remedies might be available to the Government as creditor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen the condition of the recognizance has been satisfied ... the court shall exonerate the obligors and release any bail.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.