United States v. Durades’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.2d 818 · 1979
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably United States v. Kenny (1981), United States v. North (1990)
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Patterson v. United States · Wingo v. Wedding · United States v. Mazurie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A conviction for an offense other than that charged in the indictment must be reversed if the variance between the indictment and the proof affects the substantial rights of the parties.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“interest in being tried only in a district where venue properly lay”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.