Vallejo v. Santini-Padilla’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 14 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) the severity of the violation (2) the legitimacy of the party’s excuse for failing to comply (3) whether the violations were repeated (4) the deliberateness of the misconduct (5) any mitigating excuses (6) prejudice to the other side and to the operations of the court (7) the adequacy of lesser sanctions”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Toth · Hawke Capital Partners, L.P. v. Aeromed Services Corp.

2. “[p]laintiffs have not cited a single authority in support of their assertion that their failure to timely oppose the motion to dismiss did not constitute waiver”). . Except for quoting section 1692e(2)(A) and setting out the above sentence, plaintiff does not offer any legal authority to support the argument or elaborate the basis of argument. . Although not necessary to this aspect of the decision, the March 23 and 31, 2005 letters all informed plaintiff that,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 911 F. Supp. 2d 1 - McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.

3. “whether the offending party was given sufficient notice and opportunity to explain its noncompliance or argue for a lesser penalty.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. United States v. Toth