United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 144 · 2010
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996)
Relies on Stinson v. United States · United States v. Dunnigan · United States v. Juarez-Duarte · United States v. Hill · United States v. Ollison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A factual finding is not clearly erroneous as long as it is plausible in light of the record read as a whole.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice with respect to the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense of conviction, and (2) ‘ the obstructive conduct related to (A) the defendant’s offense of conviction and any relevant conduct; or (B) a closely related offense....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ommentary contained in ... application notes is 'authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsistent with, or a plainly erroneous reading of, that guideline.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.