Meaux Surface Protection, Inc. v. Fogleman’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 161 · 2010
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on Rockwell International Corp. v. United States · Southwest Battery Corp. v. Owen · Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc. · Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. · Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. Heine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting lenders' employees to testify as lay witnesses rather than as expert witnesses ... [defendant] has offered no explanation for why the witnesses' testimony, which was based on their personal observations while working for the lenders-rather than on scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge-did not qualify as lay testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the explanation for the failure to timely [comply with the scheduling order]; (2) the importance of the [modification]; (3) potential prejudice in allowing the [modification]; and (4) the availability of a continuance to cure such prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.