United States v. DeJesus-Concepcion’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 303 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Caputo · United States v. Hardeman · United States v. Jackson · United States of America v. Felix Antonio Martinez-Santos · United States v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may consider multiple factors ..., including: “[1] a comparison of punishments imposed for the listed and unlisted offenses, [2] the perceived seriousness of the offense as indicated by the level of punishment, [3] the elements of the offense, [4] the level of culpability involved, and [5] the degree to which the commission of the offense indicates a likelihood of recurring criminal conduct.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the inquiry will necessarily focus on the particular conduct of the defendant, we give due deference to a court's application of the Guidelines to the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.