United States v. Liburd’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 339 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Fumo (2011), Elizabeth Werner v. Eric J. Werner
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 48 U.S.C. § 1561
Relies on United States v. Agurs · Darden v. Wainwright · Smith v. Phillips · California v. Trombetta · Greer v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If so, we proceed to determine whether that misconduct 'so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The quantum or weight of evidence is crucial to determining whether prosecutorial misconduct was so prejudicial as to result in a denial of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shaped the development of the record evidence ... or the trial strategy pursued by either party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.