United States v. Rollins’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 500 · 2010
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bowles v. Russell · Castro v. United States · United States v. Healy · United States v. Dieter · United States v. Ibarra
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(emphasis added)); see also United States v. Rollins, 607 F.3d 500, 502 (7th Cir. 2010) (a motion for reconsideration in a criminal case cannot”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rejuvenate an extinguished right to appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.