Katel Ltd. Liability Co. v. AT & T Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 60 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Medellin v. Texas · In re Nortel Networks Corp. Securities Litigation · Lanza v. Merrill Lynch & Co. · In Re the Arbitration Between Western Union Telegraph Co. & American Communications Ass'n · American Express Bank Ltd. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]ven when treaties are self-executing in the sense that they create federal law, the background presumption is that [i]nternational agreements, even those directly benefitting private persons, generally do not create private rights or provide for a private cause of action in domestic courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]here is a presumption that treaties do not create privately enforceable rights in the absence of express language to the contrary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defendant's intentional and unjustified procurement of the third party's breach of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.