Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 F.3d 968 - United States v. Novak

United States v. Novak’s Empirical Analysis

607 F.3d 968 · 2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
February 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 228 (Child Support Recovery Act of 1992)

Relies on United States v. Ebersole · United States v. Jeffers · United States v. Salinas · United States v. Venturella · United States v. Namey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dictionaries define “reside” as “[t]o live in a place for a permanent or extended time,” Webster’s II New College Dictionary 943 (2001), or to “[l]ive, dwell ... to have a settled abode for a time.... ” Black’s Law Dictionary (5th ed. 1979). An ordinary person would understand that a person resides where the person regularly lives or has a home as opposed to where the person might visit or vacation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.